iso13485-audit-prep – Security skill for AI agents
/compliance-os:iso13485-audit-prep [scope] — ISO 13485 QMS audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Design controls + CAPA + post-market focused. Use before Clause 8.2.4 internal audit, MDR / FDA QSR alignment review, or product-launch DHF closure audit.
Install the iso13485-audit-prep skill with one command
Pick the tool you use, copy the command and paste it in your terminal. The skill lands in that tool's skills folder and is ready in your next session.
Claude Code
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.claude/skills
Call it in Claude Code: /iso13485-audit-prep – then describe the task you want done.
Codex
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.codex/skills
Call it in Codex: $iso13485-audit-prep – then describe the task you want done.
Hermes Agent
mkdir -p ~/.hermes/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.hermes/skills
Call it in Hermes Agent: /iso13485-audit-prep – then describe the task you want done.
DeepSeek
mkdir -p ~/.deepcode/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.deepcode/skills
Call it in DeepSeek: /iso13485-audit-prep – then describe the task you want done.
SKILL.md content
/compliance-os:iso13485-audit-prep — ISO 13485 QMS Forcing Questions
Command: /compliance-os:iso13485-audit-prep <scope>
The ISO 13485 QMS auditor pressure-tests any medical-device QMS work. Six traceability-obsessed questions before any internal audit, MDR / FDA QSR review, or product launch.
When to Run
- Before annual Clause 8.2.4 internal audit
- Before MDR / FDA QSR alignment review (substantially harmonized post Feb 2026)
- Before new-device commercial launch (DHF closure audit)
- After significant CAPA closure event (effectiveness verification audit)
- Post-recall event (root cause + corrective action audit)
- Quarterly during regulatory submission preparation
The Six QMS Questions
1. Pull three random DHFs. Are design verification + validation evidence complete?
Most-cited finding area.
- DHF must include: design plan + inputs + outputs + verification + validation + transfer + changes
- Sample stratified by product class (I, IIa, IIb, III per MDR)
- Reference
iso13485_audit_playbook.mdfor the per-DHF checklist - Verify traceability matrix from user needs through clinical evidence
2. Show me the last 5 CAPAs with effectiveness verification evidence.
Second-most-cited finding area.
- Containment / correction / corrective action distinction documented
- Root cause analysis depth: 5 Why minimum
- Effectiveness verification = measurable evidence, not "we updated the procedure"
- Closure approved by appropriate authority
- Repeat CAPAs across products = systemic issue trigger
3. When was process validation (IQ/OQ/PQ) last revalidated?
Clause 7.5.6 — often stale.
- Initial validation at process introduction
- Revalidation triggers: process change, equipment change, material change, periodic schedule
- Trend monitoring (SPC) where statistical techniques apply per Clause 8.4
- Cross-check with cs-fda-qsr-auditor for 21 CFR 820.75 alignment
4. Show me the risk management file for the highest-risk product.
Clause 7.1 + ISO 14971:2019.
- Risk management plan exists per product
- Hazard identification covers reasonable foreseeable misuse
- Risk control hierarchy applied: inherent safety > protective measures > information for safety
- Residual risk evaluated + accepted with rationale
- Post-production information feeds back into RMF
- For AI-enabled medical devices: layer ISO 42001 A.5 impact assessment on top
5. Show me post-market surveillance evidence — last 6 months.
Clause 8.2.1 — high-stakes for MDR + FDA.
- Customer complaint log + investigation closure
- Vigilance reports (serious incident / FSCA) submitted per applicable regulation
- Trend analysis evidence + management review input
- Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) for MDR high-risk devices
- MDR reports per 21 CFR 803 for US-marketed devices (cross-check with cs-fda-qsr-auditor)
6. Where's the management review evidence covering all Clause 5.6 inputs?
Annual minimum; semi-annual for mature programs.
- Required inputs per Clause 5.6.2: audit results, customer feedback, process performance, product conformity, status of preventive + corrective actions, follow-up from prior reviews, changes that could affect QMS, recommendations for improvement, regulatory requirements
- Outputs per Clause 5.6.3: improvement decisions, product requirement changes, resource needs
- Integrated review across frameworks (per
multi_framework_audit_playbook.md) preferred
Workflow
# 1. Audit programme optimization
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/qms-audit-expert/scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py audit_scope.json
# 2. Mock audit for readiness check
python ../../skills/compliance-os/scripts/audit_simulator.py iso13485_scope.json
# 3. CAPA system review
# Route to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/capa-officer/ tools
# 4. Risk management file review
# Route to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/risk-management-specialist/ toolsOutput Format
# ISO 13485 Audit Prep: <scope>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[programme-plan | DHF-closure | CAPA-health | post-market-trend | pre-cert | MDR-FDA-alignment]
## Design Control Status (sampled DHFs)
- DHFs sampled: <list product IDs>
- Verification evidence: pass/fail per DHF
- Validation evidence: pass/fail per DHF
- Clinical evidence (per MDR Annex XIV / FDA 510(k)): pass/fail
- Traceability matrix complete: yes/no per DHF
## CAPA Health
- CAPAs sampled: N
- Root cause analysis depth: adequate/inadequate per CAPA
- Effectiveness verification: complete/incomplete per CAPA
- Aging CAPAs > 90 days: N
- Repeat issues across products: <list>
## Process Validation Status
- Validations on schedule: %
- Stale validations (> 12 months since revalidation): <list>
- Statistical techniques applied per Clause 8.4: yes/no
## Risk Management File Status
- Sampled product RMFs: <list>
- Post-production updates in last 12 months: <count per product>
- Residual risk acceptance signed: yes/no
## Post-Market Surveillance
- Complaint trending: stable/rising
- MDR / vigilance reports filed timely: %
- PMCF on schedule (where required): yes/no
## Management Review Status
- Last review date: YYYY-MM-DD
- Required Clause 5.6.2 inputs present: yes/no
- Open action items past due: N
## Cross-Framework Impact
- EU MDR alignment: clean / gaps in <list>
- FDA QSR alignment (post-Feb 2026): substantially harmonized; FDA-specific overlays per cs-fda-qsr-auditor
- ISO 42001 AIMS overlay (if AI-enabled device): pass/fail per Annex A
## Verdict
🟢 READY | 🟡 CLOSE-DHF-GAPS-FIRST | 🔴 NOT-READY
## Top 3 Actions
[3 concrete next steps with owner + corrective-action timeline]Routing
/compliance-os:compliance-readiness— for multi-framework view/compliance-os:fda-qsr-audit-prep— for FDA-specific overlay/compliance-os:aims-audit— for AI-enabled medical device ISO 42001 layer/compliance-os:gdpr-audit-prep— for personal-data overlap (clinical data, customer data)/c-level-agents:cpo-review— for executive product strategy decisions/c-level-agents:decide— to log the verdict
Related
- Agent: [
cs-cqm-iso13485](../../agents/cs-cqm-iso13485.md) - Skill: [
qms-audit-expert](${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/qms-audit-expert/SKILL.md) - Playbook: [iso13485_audit_playbook.md](${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/qms-audit-expert/references/iso13485_audit_playbook.md)
- Adjacent:
../fda-qsr-audit-prep/,../aims-audit/,../compliance-readiness/
---
Version: 1.0.0
Related skills
- pentest-playbook – 7-phase pentest pipeline from passive recon to exploitation.
- iso27001-audit-prep – /compliance-os:iso27001-audit-prep [scope] — ISO 27001 ISMS audit readiness 6-question…
- iso42001-specialist – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System (AIMS) specialist for compliance teams running…
- phpinfo-to-rce – Chain phpinfo to RCE via exec check when info.php exposed.
- iso42001-specialist – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System (AIMS) specialist for compliance teams running…
- port-mass-scan – Port scan /8-/24 with Masscan+RustScan and nmap banners.
- codebase-audit-pre-push – Deep audit before GitHub push: removes junk files, dead code, security holes, and…
- codebase-cleanup-deps-audit – You are a dependency security expert specializing in vulnerability scanning, license…