iso13485-audit-prep – skill Bảo mật cho agent AI
/compliance-os:iso13485-audit-prep [scope] — Bộ câu hỏi truy vấn bắt buộc gồm 6 câu để chuẩn bị kiểm toán QMS ISO 13485. Tập trung vào kiểm soát thiết kế, CAPA và giám sát sau lưu hành. Dùng trước kiểm toán nội bộ Điều 8.2.4, rà soát đối chiếu MDR / FDA QSR, hoặc kiểm toán đóng DHF trước khi ra mắt sản phẩm.
Cài skill iso13485-audit-prep bằng một lệnh
Chọn công cụ bạn đang dùng, copy lệnh và dán vào terminal. Skill sẽ nằm trong thư mục skills của công cụ đó và sẵn sàng dùng ở phiên làm việc tiếp theo.
Claude Code
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.claude/skills
Gọi trong Claude Code: /iso13485-audit-prep – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Codex
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.codex/skills
Gọi trong Codex: $iso13485-audit-prep – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Hermes Agent
mkdir -p ~/.hermes/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.hermes/skills
Gọi trong Hermes Agent: /iso13485-audit-prep – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
DeepSeek
mkdir -p ~/.deepcode/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/iso13485-audit-prep-4f7f2.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.deepcode/skills
Gọi trong DeepSeek: /iso13485-audit-prep – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Nội dung SKILL.md
Nội dung SKILL.md gốc bằng tiếng Anh.
/compliance-os:iso13485-audit-prep — ISO 13485 QMS Forcing Questions
Command: /compliance-os:iso13485-audit-prep <scope>
The ISO 13485 QMS auditor pressure-tests any medical-device QMS work. Six traceability-obsessed questions before any internal audit, MDR / FDA QSR review, or product launch.
When to Run
- Before annual Clause 8.2.4 internal audit
- Before MDR / FDA QSR alignment review (substantially harmonized post Feb 2026)
- Before new-device commercial launch (DHF closure audit)
- After significant CAPA closure event (effectiveness verification audit)
- Post-recall event (root cause + corrective action audit)
- Quarterly during regulatory submission preparation
The Six QMS Questions
1. Pull three random DHFs. Are design verification + validation evidence complete?
Most-cited finding area.
- DHF must include: design plan + inputs + outputs + verification + validation + transfer + changes
- Sample stratified by product class (I, IIa, IIb, III per MDR)
- Reference
iso13485_audit_playbook.mdfor the per-DHF checklist - Verify traceability matrix from user needs through clinical evidence
2. Show me the last 5 CAPAs with effectiveness verification evidence.
Second-most-cited finding area.
- Containment / correction / corrective action distinction documented
- Root cause analysis depth: 5 Why minimum
- Effectiveness verification = measurable evidence, not "we updated the procedure"
- Closure approved by appropriate authority
- Repeat CAPAs across products = systemic issue trigger
3. When was process validation (IQ/OQ/PQ) last revalidated?
Clause 7.5.6 — often stale.
- Initial validation at process introduction
- Revalidation triggers: process change, equipment change, material change, periodic schedule
- Trend monitoring (SPC) where statistical techniques apply per Clause 8.4
- Cross-check with cs-fda-qsr-auditor for 21 CFR 820.75 alignment
4. Show me the risk management file for the highest-risk product.
Clause 7.1 + ISO 14971:2019.
- Risk management plan exists per product
- Hazard identification covers reasonable foreseeable misuse
- Risk control hierarchy applied: inherent safety > protective measures > information for safety
- Residual risk evaluated + accepted with rationale
- Post-production information feeds back into RMF
- For AI-enabled medical devices: layer ISO 42001 A.5 impact assessment on top
5. Show me post-market surveillance evidence — last 6 months.
Clause 8.2.1 — high-stakes for MDR + FDA.
- Customer complaint log + investigation closure
- Vigilance reports (serious incident / FSCA) submitted per applicable regulation
- Trend analysis evidence + management review input
- Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) for MDR high-risk devices
- MDR reports per 21 CFR 803 for US-marketed devices (cross-check with cs-fda-qsr-auditor)
6. Where's the management review evidence covering all Clause 5.6 inputs?
Annual minimum; semi-annual for mature programs.
- Required inputs per Clause 5.6.2: audit results, customer feedback, process performance, product conformity, status of preventive + corrective actions, follow-up from prior reviews, changes that could affect QMS, recommendations for improvement, regulatory requirements
- Outputs per Clause 5.6.3: improvement decisions, product requirement changes, resource needs
- Integrated review across frameworks (per
multi_framework_audit_playbook.md) preferred
Workflow
# 1. Audit programme optimization
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/qms-audit-expert/scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py audit_scope.json
# 2. Mock audit for readiness check
python ../../skills/compliance-os/scripts/audit_simulator.py iso13485_scope.json
# 3. CAPA system review
# Route to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/capa-officer/ tools
# 4. Risk management file review
# Route to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/risk-management-specialist/ toolsOutput Format
# ISO 13485 Audit Prep: <scope>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[programme-plan | DHF-closure | CAPA-health | post-market-trend | pre-cert | MDR-FDA-alignment]
## Design Control Status (sampled DHFs)
- DHFs sampled: <list product IDs>
- Verification evidence: pass/fail per DHF
- Validation evidence: pass/fail per DHF
- Clinical evidence (per MDR Annex XIV / FDA 510(k)): pass/fail
- Traceability matrix complete: yes/no per DHF
## CAPA Health
- CAPAs sampled: N
- Root cause analysis depth: adequate/inadequate per CAPA
- Effectiveness verification: complete/incomplete per CAPA
- Aging CAPAs > 90 days: N
- Repeat issues across products: <list>
## Process Validation Status
- Validations on schedule: %
- Stale validations (> 12 months since revalidation): <list>
- Statistical techniques applied per Clause 8.4: yes/no
## Risk Management File Status
- Sampled product RMFs: <list>
- Post-production updates in last 12 months: <count per product>
- Residual risk acceptance signed: yes/no
## Post-Market Surveillance
- Complaint trending: stable/rising
- MDR / vigilance reports filed timely: %
- PMCF on schedule (where required): yes/no
## Management Review Status
- Last review date: YYYY-MM-DD
- Required Clause 5.6.2 inputs present: yes/no
- Open action items past due: N
## Cross-Framework Impact
- EU MDR alignment: clean / gaps in <list>
- FDA QSR alignment (post-Feb 2026): substantially harmonized; FDA-specific overlays per cs-fda-qsr-auditor
- ISO 42001 AIMS overlay (if AI-enabled device): pass/fail per Annex A
## Verdict
🟢 READY | 🟡 CLOSE-DHF-GAPS-FIRST | 🔴 NOT-READY
## Top 3 Actions
[3 concrete next steps with owner + corrective-action timeline]Routing
/compliance-os:compliance-readiness— for multi-framework view/compliance-os:fda-qsr-audit-prep— for FDA-specific overlay/compliance-os:aims-audit— for AI-enabled medical device ISO 42001 layer/compliance-os:gdpr-audit-prep— for personal-data overlap (clinical data, customer data)/c-level-agents:cpo-review— for executive product strategy decisions/c-level-agents:decide— to log the verdict
Related
- Agent: [
cs-cqm-iso13485](../../agents/cs-cqm-iso13485.md) - Skill: [
qms-audit-expert](${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/qms-audit-expert/SKILL.md) - Playbook: [iso13485_audit_playbook.md](${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/ra-qm-team/qms-audit-expert/references/iso13485_audit_playbook.md)
- Adjacent:
../fda-qsr-audit-prep/,../aims-audit/,../compliance-readiness/
---
Version: 1.0.0
Skill liên quan
- pentest-playbook – Quy trình kiểm thử xâm nhập 7 giai đoạn, từ do thám thụ động đến khai thác.
- iso27001-audit-prep – /compliance-os:iso27001-audit-prep [scope] — Bộ câu hỏi truy vấn bắt buộc gồm 6 câu để…
- iso42001-specialist – Chuyên gia Hệ thống quản lý AI (AIMS) theo ISO/IEC 42001:2023 hỗ trợ các nhóm tuân thủ…
- phpinfo-to-rce – Chuỗi tấn công từ phpinfo đến RCE thông qua kiểm tra exec khi info.php bị lộ.
- iso42001-specialist – Chuyên gia ISO/IEC 42001:2023 về Hệ thống Quản lý AI (AIMS) cho các nhóm tuân thủ thực…
- port-mass-scan – Quét cổng dải /8-/24 bằng Masscan+RustScan và nhận diện banner bằng nmap.
- codebase-audit-pre-push – Kiểm tra kỹ trước khi đẩy lên GitHub: loại bỏ file rác, code chết, lỗ hổng bảo mật và…
- codebase-cleanup-deps-audit – Bạn là chuyên gia bảo mật phụ thuộc, chuyên quét lỗ hổng, tuân thủ giấy phép và an toàn…