eval – Agents & Automation skill for AI agents
Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session. Use when the user runs /hub:eval or asks to score, compare, or pick a winner among completed AgentHub agents.
Install the eval skill with one command
Pick the tool you use, copy the command and paste it in your terminal. The skill lands in that tool's skills folder and is ready in your next session.
Claude Code
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/eval-daf59.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.claude/skills
Call it in Claude Code: /eval – then describe the task you want done.
Codex
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/eval-daf59.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.codex/skills
Call it in Codex: $eval – then describe the task you want done.
Hermes Agent
mkdir -p ~/.hermes/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/eval-daf59.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.hermes/skills
Call it in Hermes Agent: /eval – then describe the task you want done.
DeepSeek
mkdir -p ~/.deepcode/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/eval-daf59.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.deepcode/skills
Call it in DeepSeek: /eval – then describe the task you want done.
SKILL.md content
/hub:eval — Evaluate Agent Results
Rank all agent results for a session. Supports metric-based evaluation (run a command), LLM judge (compare diffs), or hybrid.
Usage
/hub:eval # Eval latest session using configured criteria
/hub:eval 20260317-143022 # Eval specific session
/hub:eval --judge # Force LLM judge mode (ignore metric config)What It Does
Metric Mode (eval command configured)
Run the evaluation command in each agent's worktree:
python {skill_path}/scripts/result_ranker.py \
--session {session-id} \
--eval-cmd "{eval_cmd}" \
--metric {metric} --direction {direction}Output:
RANK AGENT METRIC DELTA FILES
1 agent-2 142ms -38ms 2
2 agent-1 165ms -15ms 3
3 agent-3 190ms +10ms 1
Winner: agent-2 (142ms)LLM Judge Mode (no eval command, or --judge flag)
For each agent:
1. Get the diff: git diff {base_branch}...{agent_branch}
2. Read the agent's result post from .agenthub/board/results/agent-{i}-result.md
3. Compare all diffs and rank by:
- Correctness — Does it solve the task?
- Simplicity — Fewer lines changed is better (when equal correctness)
- Quality — Clean execution, good structure, no regressions
Present rankings with justification.
Example LLM judge output for a content task:
RANK AGENT VERDICT WORD COUNT
1 agent-1 Strong narrative, clear CTA 1480
2 agent-3 Good data points, weak intro 1520
3 agent-2 Generic tone, no differentiation 1350
Winner: agent-1 (strongest narrative arc and call-to-action)Hybrid Mode
1. Run metric evaluation first
2. If top agents are within 10% of each other, use LLM judge to break ties
3. Present both metric and qualitative rankings
After Eval
1. Update session state:
python {skill_path}/scripts/session_manager.py --update {session-id} --state evaluating2. Tell the user:
- Ranked results with winner highlighted
- Next step:
/hub:mergeto merge the winner - Or
/hub:merge {session-id} --agent {winner}to be explicit
Related skills
- execute – /c-level-agents:execute [decision] — Generate a 90-day execution plan with weekly…
- bdi-mental-states – This skill should be used when the user asks to "model agent mental states", "implement…
- extract – Turn a proven pattern or debugging solution into a standalone reusable skill with…
- bifrost-gateway – Run and configure Bifrost, the open-source AI gateway: one OpenAI-compatible API for 20+…
- bilig-workpaper – Use formula-backed WorkPaper JSON and MCP tools for agent spreadsheet tasks without…
- billing-automation – Master automated billing systems including recurring billing, invoice generation…
- fable-goal – Convert a rambling description of a desired outcome into one polished, autonomous /goal…
- bitbucket-automation – Automate Bitbucket repositories, pull requests, branches, issues, and workspace…