vpe-review – skill Lập trình cho agent AI
/c-level-agents:vpe-review [plan] — Rà soát kế hoạch ưu tiên thông lượng của VP of Engineering đối với bất kỳ kế hoạch nào tác động đến giao hàng, tuyển dụng kỹ sư, cấu trúc đội ngũ hoặc kỷ luật production. Dùng khi cycle time tăng vọt, chỉ số DORA đi xuống, hoặc trước khi cam kết đợt tuyển dụng kỹ sư lớn hoặc tái cơ cấu.
Cài skill vpe-review bằng một lệnh
Chọn công cụ bạn đang dùng, copy lệnh và dán vào terminal. Skill sẽ nằm trong thư mục skills của công cụ đó và sẵn sàng dùng ở phiên làm việc tiếp theo.
Claude Code
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/vpe-review-45cc1.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.claude/skills
Gọi trong Claude Code: /vpe-review – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Codex
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/vpe-review-45cc1.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.codex/skills
Gọi trong Codex: $vpe-review – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Hermes Agent
mkdir -p ~/.hermes/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/vpe-review-45cc1.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.hermes/skills
Gọi trong Hermes Agent: /vpe-review – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
DeepSeek
mkdir -p ~/.deepcode/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/vpe-review-45cc1.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.deepcode/skills
Gọi trong DeepSeek: /vpe-review – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Nội dung SKILL.md
Nội dung SKILL.md gốc bằng tiếng Anh.
/c-level-agents:vpe-review — VPE Forcing Questions
Command: /c-level-agents:vpe-review <plan>
The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change.
When to Run
- Before quarterly delivery commitment (sprint planning, OKR review)
- Before approving an eng hiring plan
- Before restructuring eng teams (splitting/merging squads, adding tribes)
- Before deciding whether to hire a VPE separately from CTO (or merge them)
- When production incidents are increasing
- When sprint velocity is dropping but everyone says "we're working hard"
The Six VPE Questions
1. What's the cycle time, and where does work wait?
No DORA, no diagnosis.
- Lead Time for Changes is the single best health metric
- If you can't decompose cycle time into stages, you can't fix the bottleneck
- Run
delivery_throughput_analyzer.py
2. What's the DORA performance level on all 4 metrics?
One Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy.
- Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, MTTR, Change Failure Rate
- The worst metric defines overall level
- Fix lead time first; everything else follows
3. Where is the hiring funnel leaking?
"Can't find good engineers" is wrong.
- Specific stage is over-filtering OR top-of-funnel volume is too low OR offer-to-accept is broken
- Run
eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py - If offer-to-accept < 70%, comp is below market or close discipline is weak
4. Is the team structure healthy for the headcount?
5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director.
- Run
eng_team_structure_designer.py - Manager-trigger fires when 5+ ICs have no dedicated EM
- Director-trigger fires when 3+ EMs report directly to VPE/CTO
5. What's the production discipline maturity?
Level 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage.
- On-call rotation ≥ 6 people
- Severity-defined incident response with blameless postmortems
- SLOs on customer-facing services (pair with
engineering/slo-architect/) - Continuous deployment OR scheduled — not "usually one, sometimes the other"
6. Are we adding a VPE separately, or is CTO doing both?
If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed.
- Or: VPE complement when CTO is co-founder more comfortable with strategy
- VPE owns operating model; CTO owns architecture
- At small scale (< 20 eng), one person can do both
Workflow
# 1. Delivery throughput
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json
# 2. Hiring funnel
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json
# 3. Team structure
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.jsonOutput Format
# VPE Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO]
## Delivery Throughput (if applicable)
- DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low
- Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR>
- Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time)
- Top fix: <action + owner>
## Hiring Funnel (if applicable)
- End-to-end conversion: X%
- Weakest stage: <stage>
- Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed
- Top fix: <specific action>
## Team Structure (if applicable)
- Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes>
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no
- Director trigger fired: yes/no
- Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad>
## Production Discipline (if applicable)
- Current maturity level: 1-5
- Next practice to add: <specific>
- SLO coverage: X / Y services
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]Routing
/c-level-agents:cto-review— for architectural causes of throughput problemscs-chro-advisoragent — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues/c-level-agents:cfo-review— for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget/c-level-agents:ciso-review— for production discipline + compliance overlap/c-level-agents:decide— log the verdict/c-level-agents:freeze 30— on multi-year hiring commitments
Related
- Agent: [
cs-vpe-advisor](../../agents/cs-vpe-advisor.md) - Skill: [
vpe-advisor](${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/SKILL.md) - Adjacent:
../../../engineering/slo-architect/,../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/,../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/
---
Version: 1.0.0
Skill liên quan
- learn – Giúp người dùng học một chủ đề qua kèm cặp thích ứng, lập kế hoạch bài học, luyện tập…
- legacy-modernizer – Tái cấu trúc mã nguồn cũ, di chuyển framework lỗi thời và triển khai hiện đại hóa từng…
- leiloeiro-avaliacao – Tổ chức bằng chứng và các kịch bản định giá tham khảo cho bất động sản đấu giá, với giới…
- weekly-review – Dùng khi ai đó muốn chạy đánh giá hàng tuần, khép các việc còn mở, rà soát dự án và cam…
- leiloeiro-risco – Phân tích rủi ro đấu giá bất động sản. Thang điểm 40 điểm, rủi ro pháp lý/tài chính/vận…
- lightning-architecture-review – Đánh giá thiết kế giao thức Bitcoin Lightning Network, so sánh các cách tiếp cận channel…
- linkedin-cli – Dùng khi tự động hóa LinkedIn qua CLI: lấy hồ sơ, tìm người/công ty, gửi tin nhắn, quản…
- llm-app-patterns – Phác thảo kiến trúc và cách tích hợp cho ứng dụng LLM, với ranh giới rõ ràng cho truy…