project-based-performance – skill Lập trình cho agent AI

Project-Based Performance

What it is: Per-project reviews.

Overview

Works out the smallest useful Project-Based Performance setup for the business in front of it, then

builds it only when asked. The default output is a short recommendation, not a

spreadsheet. Artifacts - CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, Notion mapping - are produced on

request, from one field list so they cannot drift apart.

Layer: Layer 8: Operate. Fits: Scale stage. Table code: n/a.

When to Use This Skill

• project performance review
• project feedback
• delivery scorecard
• project review tracker

Also use it when the user says "per-project reviews", or describes the same process happening in a

spreadsheet, a document or someone inboxes.

Do not use it for: payroll calculation, tax filing, or legal advice. This skill produces

empty templates only - it never holds or processes real employee or customer data.

How It Works

Follow the shared execution contract. The module-specific rules below define only domain fields, decisions, calculations, and safety constraints.

Step 1 - Identify intent

Read the request and pick the intent before asking anything.

• "set up" or "build" or "create" -> the user wants artifacts; go to Step 2.
• "our process is ..." or "it is in a sheet" -> the user wants to move an existing process; capture it, then Step 2.
• "is this right" or "review" or "audit" -> the user wants a check, not a build; answer from what they share.
• "how do I ..." -> advice question; answer directly and offer the build only if it helps.

Ask only if this is the highest-value missing fact; otherwise proceed without an opener:

> Q: How many live projects do you have?

Step 2 - Ask only what is missing

Skip anything the user already answered, in any earlier message. Ask the rest one at a

time, and stop as soon as the remaining answers would not change the output.

• Projects - How many live? / How long each? / Who owns delivery?
• Measures - Delivered on time? / Budget or effort? / Client satisfaction?
• Cadence - How often reviewed? / Who reviews? / Team or individual?
• Current process - Is it captured now? / Status report or a sheet? / Is it comparable?
• Outcome - What do you need? / A project scorecard or a status tracker?

Never invent an answer. If the user does not know, record it as unknown and carry on.

Step 3 - Hold the internal context

Hold the answers in this shape. It stays internal - it is not shown to the user unless

they ask, and it never carries a value the user did not give.

module: project-based-performance
intent: null            # setup | advice | review | fix | build | convert | export
scale: null             # Starter | Growth | Scale, only if the answer changes it
areas:
  "Projects": null
  "Measures": null
  "Cadence": null
  "Current process": null
  "Outcome": null
requested_outputs: []   # csv | sql | json | notion | xlsx - requested formats only
confirmed_facts: []     # only what the user actually said
open_questions: []      # the unanswered ones, in the order worth asking

Step 4 - Recommend the smallest workflow

If an artifact was requested, build it after resolving essential missing facts. Otherwise give a short recommendation and offer the relevant artifact.

Recommended approach: Score a project at completion against three or four fixed measures, and keep a close reason code so the data improves over time.

Why this one: Project performance needs a consistent denominator to be comparable. Fix the measures, rating rubric, scope and review period; comparisons still require context and evidence.

Workflow: Project delivered → Measures scored → Close reason recorded → Review across projects

Step 5 - Build only on request

Once the user asks for it, derive the fields from the confirmed context and emit the

requested artifacts. For machine-readable text, keep prose outside the data; for files,

provide a usable link. Report material validation failures or limitations separately.

**A selected Notion output is rendered by notion-manual-import, so route the

Notion step there.** When the user selects Notion, hand that step to

@notion-manual-import: it holds the CSV, the property

mapping, the import steps and the verification checklist, and it renders the Field

Reference below instead of defining a table of its own. Do not restate the mapping

here and do not improvise the import steps. Manual CSV and mapping outputs need no

connection. For requested workspace changes, follow the shared contract: verify actual

tool access and the target before writing. A user saying "connected" is not tool evidence.

Never ask for a Notion password or token.

For an Excel-compatible CSV, use UTF-8 with a byte order mark so Excel opens the

text correctly. A CSV is not an .xlsx workbook; create .xlsx only when the user

requests a workbook.

A CSV carries no types, so after it, name the columns

that need a number, date or currency format applied.

Project Review Title,Employee Name,Project,Project Manager,Role on Project,Review Date,Delivery Score,Quality Score,Collaboration Score,Overall Score,Feedback,Linked Performance Review,Status,Project Review ID
Northwind handover review,Aarav Sharma,Website Redesign,Sneha Iyer,Delivery Lead,2026-01-15,5,4,5,4.2,Clearer deadlines would help. Handovers went well this quarter.,REV-2026-Q1,In Progress,

CREATE TABLE project_based_performance (
  project_review_title VARCHAR(255),
  employee_name VARCHAR(255),
  project VARCHAR(255),
  project_manager VARCHAR(255),
  role_on_project VARCHAR(255),
  review_date DATE NOT NULL,
  delivery_score NUMERIC NOT NULL,
  quality_score NUMERIC NOT NULL,
  collaboration_score NUMERIC NOT NULL,
  overall_score NUMERIC NOT NULL,
  feedback TEXT,
  linked_performance_review VARCHAR(255),  -- relation -> target record
  status VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
  project_review_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW(),
  updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE INDEX idx_project_based_performance_status ON project_based_performance (status);

{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "title": "Project-Based Performance",
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": false,
  "properties": {
      "Project Review Title": { "type": "string" },
      "Employee Name": { "type": "string" },
      "Project": { "type": "string" },
      "Project Manager": { "type": "string" },
      "Role on Project": { "type": "string" },
      "Review Date": { "type": "string", "format": "date" },
      "Delivery Score": { "type": "number" },
      "Quality Score": { "type": "number" },
      "Collaboration Score": { "type": "number" },
      "Overall Score": { "type": "number" },
      "Feedback": { "type": "string" },
      "Linked Performance Review": { "type": "string" },
      "Status": { "type": "string" },
      "Project Review ID": { "type": "integer" }
  },
  "required": [
      "Review Date",
      "Delivery Score",
      "Quality Score",
      "Collaboration Score",
      "Overall Score",
      "Status"
  ]
}

| CSV column | Notion property | Set after import |
|---|---|---|
| Project Review Title | Title | Use as the database title |
| Employee Name | Text | Leave as Text |
| Project | Text | Leave as Text |
| Project Manager | Text | Leave as Text |
| Role on Project | Text | Leave as Text |
| Review Date | Date | Convert to Date |
| Delivery Score | Number | Convert to Number |
| Quality Score | Number | Convert to Number |
| Collaboration Score | Number | Convert to Number |
| Overall Score | Number | Convert to Number |
| Feedback | Text | Leave as Text |
| Linked Performance Review | Relation (link to the target database) | Convert to Relation, link to the target database |
| Status | Select (add options after import) | Convert to Select, add options: "Not Started", "In Progress", "Submitted", "Assessed", "Closed" |
| Project Review ID | Text (preserve source ID) | Keep imported IDs as Text; optionally add a separate Unique ID property |

The rows above are documentation examples only. Emit empty templates unless the user explicitly requests examples. Money stays currency, dates stay date,

and anything pointing at another table stays relation.

The baseline is a person-on-project review template, not a schedule/budget overrun dataset. For the worked overrun request, replace subjective person scores with planned/actual dates, planned/actual effort or cost, scope changes and close reason consistently across outputs. Overall Score is a supplied value; specify weights/rubric before calculating it and do not infer individual performance from project outcomes.

Field Reference

| # | Field | Type | SQL | JSON Schema | Notion | CSV example |

|---:|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| 1 | Project Review Title | text | VARCHAR(255) | string | Text | Northwind handover review |

| 2 | Employee Name | text | `

… (nội dung đầy đủ có trong gói tải về)