karpathy-coder – skill Lập trình cho agent AI
Dùng khi viết, review hoặc commit code để áp dụng 4 nguyên tắc code của Karpathy — nêu giả định trước khi code, giữ đơn giản, thay đổi có chủ đích, và định nghĩa mục tiêu kiểm chứng được. Kích hoạt khi "review my diff", "check complexity", "am I overcomplicating this", "karpathy check", "before I commit", hoặc bất kỳ code
Cài skill karpathy-coder bằng một lệnh
Chọn công cụ bạn đang dùng, copy lệnh và dán vào terminal. Skill sẽ nằm trong thư mục skills của công cụ đó và sẵn sàng dùng ở phiên làm việc tiếp theo.
Claude Code
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/karpathy-coder-69b51.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.claude/skills
Gọi trong Claude Code: /karpathy-coder – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Codex
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/karpathy-coder-69b51.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.codex/skills
Gọi trong Codex: $karpathy-coder – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Hermes Agent
mkdir -p ~/.hermes/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/karpathy-coder-69b51.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.hermes/skills
Gọi trong Hermes Agent: /karpathy-coder – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
DeepSeek
mkdir -p ~/.deepcode/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/karpathy-coder-69b51.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.deepcode/skills
Gọi trong DeepSeek: /karpathy-coder – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Nội dung SKILL.md
Nội dung SKILL.md gốc bằng tiếng Anh.
Karpathy Coder — Active Coding Discipline
Derived from [Andrej Karpathy's observations](https://x.com/karpathy/status/2015883857489522876) on LLM coding pitfalls. This is not just guidelines — it ships Python tools that detect violations, a review agent, a slash command, and a pre-commit hook.
> "The models make wrong assumptions on your behalf and just run along with them without checking. They don't manage their confusion, don't seek clarifications, don't surface inconsistencies, don't present tradeoffs, don't push back when they should."
>
> "They really like to overcomplicate code and APIs, bloat abstractions, don't clean up dead code... implement a bloated construction over 1000 lines when 100 would do."
>
> "LLMs are exceptionally good at looping until they meet specific goals... Don't tell it what to do, give it success criteria and watch it go."
>
> — Andrej Karpathy
The four principles
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
- State assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
The test: Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated? If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
| Instead of... | Transform to... |
|---|---|
| "Add validation" | "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass" |
| "Fix the bug" | "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass" |
| "Refactor X" | "Ensure tests pass before and after" |
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]Slash command
/karpathy-check — Run the full 4-principle review on your staged changes.
Python tools (scripts/)
All tools are stdlib-only. Run with --help.
| Script | What it detects |
|---|---|
| complexity_checker.py | Over-engineering: too many classes, deep nesting, high cyclomatic complexity, unused params, premature abstractions |
| diff_surgeon.py | Diff noise: lines that don't trace to the stated goal — comment changes, style drift, drive-by refactors |
| assumption_linter.py | Hidden assumptions in a plan: unasked features, missing clarifications, silent interpretation choices |
| goal_verifier.py | Weak success criteria: vague plans without verifiable checks, missing test assertions |
Sub-agent
karpathy-reviewer — Runs all 4 principles against a diff. Dispatched by /karpathy-check or manually before committing.
Pre-commit hook
hooks/karpathy-gate.sh — runs complexity_checker.py and diff_surgeon.py on staged files. Warns (non-blocking) when violations are found. Wire it via .claude/settings.json or Husky.
References
references/karpathy-principles.md— the source quotes, deeper context, when to relax each principlereferences/anti-patterns.md— 10+ before/after examples across Python, TypeScript, and shellreferences/enforcement-patterns.md— how to wire hooks, CI integration, team adoption
When to relax
These principles bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks (typo fixes, obvious one-liners), use judgment. The principles matter most on:
- Non-trivial implementations (>20 lines changed)
- Code you don't fully understand
- Multi-step tasks with unclear requirements
- Anything that will be reviewed by humans
Cross-tool compatibility
Installs via plugin for Claude Code. For other tools, copy the principles into your schema file:
| Tool | Schema file |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | CLAUDE.md (auto-loaded by plugin) |
| Codex CLI | AGENTS.md |
| Cursor | AGENTS.md or .cursorrules |
| Antigravity / OpenCode / Gemini CLI | AGENTS.md |
Related skills (chains via context: fork)
self-eval— honest quality scoring after completing workcode-reviewer— broader code review; karpathy-coder focuses on the 4 LLM-specific pitfallsllm-wiki— compound knowledge; karpathy-coder ensures you don't overcomplicate while building it
Skill liên quan
- codebase-cleanup-refactor-clean – Bạn là chuyên gia tái cấu trúc code, chuyên về nguyên tắc clean code, các mẫu thiết kế…
- codebase-cleanup-tech-debt – Xác định nợ kỹ thuật từ code thực tế và lịch sử thay đổi, ước tính tác động và ưu tiên…
- codex-delegate – Giao việc code cho OpenAI Codex CLI chỉ khi người dùng yêu cầu rõ ràng, trong khi…
- codex-profiles – Dùng codex-profiles để chạy Codex CLI hoặc Codex Desktop với các profile CODEX_HOME tách…
- codex-review – Đánh giá mã chuyên nghiệp, tự động tạo CHANGELOG, tích hợp với Codex AI. Dùng khi bạn…
- cohesivity – Cấp phát dịch vụ backend không giao diện cho AI agent qua Cohesivity: lưu trữ, cơ sở dữ…
- commandcode-delegate – Giao tác vụ lập trình cho Command Code CLI (`cmd`) chỉ khi người dùng yêu cầu rõ ràng…
- react-state-management – Làm chủ quản lý state React hiện đại với Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai và React Query…