identity-mirror – skill Khác cho agent AI

Use a marketing planning and audience-research lens. Your task is to identify the aspirational identity the target customer wants to inhabit, then rewrite outputs so the brand or offer reflects that identity back.

When to Use

• Use when messaging needs to reflect the audience's self-image, aspirations, or in-group identity.
• Use when you want copy to feel personally resonant rather than broadly persuasive.

Evidence and scope

Use observed audience research and verified product facts. Psychological interpretations and the author-year references below are inherited conceptual context, not validated evidence for this exact workflow or a guaranteed conversion effect. Before using a scientific claim externally, verify the actual publication, method and applicability; omit unsupported claims. This is marketing planning, not clinical diagnosis. Do not infer sensitive traits or exploit vulnerabilities.

Original contribution: [PR 451](https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/pull/451) by MMEHDI0606; [immutable source snapshot](https://github.com/MMEHDI0606/antigravity-awesome-skills/blob/9c61357e3e6bb167946036f52ac1e28fc82e04d0/skills/identity-mirror/SKILL.md). This identifies the contributed instructions, not scientific validation or a new upstream endorsement.

CONTEXT GATHERING

Before mirroring identity, establish:

1. The Target Human - psychographic profile and self-concept.

2. The Objective - what identity shift or reinforcement is needed.

3. The Output - identity map and language patterns.

4. Constraints - culture, category, and ethics.

If the desired identity is unclear, ask before proceeding.

PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: ASPIRATIONAL SELF-CONCEPT REFLECTION

Mechanism

People gravitate toward brands and messages that validate who they believe they are or who they want to become. Identity-consistent language reduces resistance and increases perceived fit, but only when it feels attainable and credible. Use self-identity, self-brand connection, and social identity theory to reflect the customer accurately (Smith et al., 2008; Bagozzi et al., 2021; Quach et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025).

Execution Steps

Step 1 - Identify the current self-concept

State how the customer sees themselves now.

*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): self-identity predicts consumer behavior beyond demographics (Smith et al., 2008).*

Step 2 - Identify the aspirational identity

State who they want to become or be seen as.

*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): self-brand connection strengthens preference when the brand matches the desired self (Bagozzi et al., 2021; Quach et al., 2025).*

Step 3 - Define the identity gap

Determine whether the gap is small, medium, or large.

*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): identity messages must feel achievable or they trigger defensiveness (identity and self-concept research).*

Step 4 - Mirror the language

Use words, imagery, and proof that make the aspirational self feel recognized.

*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): self-relevance and similarity increase persuasion and belonging (Ooms et al., 2019; Moyer-Gusé et al., 2022).*

Step 5 - Keep the promise believable

Ensure the product can genuinely support the identity.

*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): overclaiming identity fit creates dissonance and distrust (Bagozzi et al., 2021).*

DECISION MATRIX

Variable: identity gap

• If small -> mirror and affirm.
• If medium -> mirror plus stretch.
• If large -> bridge with proof and gradual change.

Variable: audience motivation

• If validation-seeking -> emphasize belonging and recognition.
• If growth-seeking -> emphasize progress and mastery.
• If status-seeking -> emphasize visibility and distinction.

Variable: category type

• If practical -> keep identity cues subtle.
• If symbolic -> make identity cues explicit.
• If community-based -> emphasize social belonging and shared language.

FAILURE MODES - DO NOT DO THESE

Failure Mode 1

• Agents typically: write identity language that feels aspirational but fake.
• Why it fails psychologically: unattainable identity claims trigger rejection.
• Instead: make the identity believable and supported.

Failure Mode 2

• Agents typically: mirror every identity trait to everyone.
• Why it fails psychologically: generic mirroring feels shallow.
• Instead: pick the single strongest identity signal.

Failure Mode 3

• Agents typically: ignore cultural variation in identity expression.
• Why it fails psychologically: identity cues are not universal.
• Instead: calibrate to culture and category.

ETHICAL GUARDRAILS

This skill must:

• Reflect the audience honestly.
• Avoid manipulation through false status promises.
• Respect identity boundaries.

The line between persuasion and manipulation is helping people see a real identity fit versus manufacturing an identity aspiration that the product cannot honor. Never cross it.

SKILL CHAINING

Optional context from related skills (equivalent supplied research is sufficient; do not create a prerequisite cycle):

• [ ] @customer-psychographic-profiler
• [ ] @jobs-to-be-done-analyst

This skill's output feeds into:

• [ ] @copywriting-psychologist
• [ ] @visual-emotion-engineer
• [ ] @brand-perception-psychologist
• [ ] @pitch-psychologist

OUTPUT QUALITY CHECK

Before finalizing output, the agent asks:

• [ ] Did I identify the current and aspirational self-concept?
• [ ] Did I keep the identity gap believable?
• [ ] Did I mirror language and imagery accurately?
• [ ] Did I avoid shallow identity theater?
• [ ] Would the customer feel seen, not sold to?

Example

User request:

> Rewrite this message so it reflects the audience identity and aspirations without inventing claims.

Illustrative output: If interviews describe the audience as independent shop owners, test language about running their own business; do not invent status aspirations or promise a changed identity.

Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.