geo-crawlers – skill Dữ liệu & Khoa học cho agent AI

AI Crawler Access Analysis Skill

Purpose

Review crawler access for a specified site and publisher policy. Access is one

input to discovery, not a guarantee of indexing/citation; training opt-out is

separate from search access and cannot remove existing model knowledge. Do not

recommend allowing training merely to improve a visibility score. Confirm the

owner's licensing, privacy, load and search goals first.

Verified operator distinctions

| Token | Purpose/control | Policy implication |

|---|---|---|

| GPTBot | OpenAI model-training crawl | Independent of search permission |

| OAI-SearchBot | ChatGPT search indexing | Search opt-out can still permit navigational links |

| ChatGPT-User | User-directed requests | Not automatic indexing; robots rules may not apply |

| ClaudeBot | Potential model-training content | Distinct from Claude search/retrieval agents |

| Claude-SearchBot | Search indexing/quality | Review separately from training |

| Claude-User | User-directed retrieval | Review the publisher's desired access |

| Google-Extended | Product-control token for Gemini training/grounding | No separate HTTP UA; does not control Google Search inclusion/ranking |

Sources: [OpenAI](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/bots),

[Anthropic](https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8896518-does-anthropic-crawl-data-from-the-web-and-how-can-site-owners-block-the-crawler),

[Google](https://developers.google.cn/crawling/docs/crawlers-fetchers/google-common-crawlers?hl=en).

User-Agent text is spoofable: verify operator-published source IPs/methods before

attributing log traffic. Full UA versions change; match documented tokens.

Other imported names (PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, Applebot-Extended, Amazonbot,

FacebookBot, CCBot, Bytespider, cohere-ai and historical anthropic-ai) are leads to

verify against each operator's current documentation. Do not infer their current

search/training behavior, user counts or business value from this list.

Worked policy example

For a publisher who explicitly wants ChatGPT search but declines OpenAI training,

propose a minimal diff after reviewing existing groups:

User-agent: OAI-SearchBot
Allow: /public/
Disallow: /

User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /

This allows the selected public subtree according to longest-match rules. Merge

with the existing policy; never replace unrelated crawler/path restrictions or

rely on robots.txt as access control. Private pages still need authentication.

Actual retrieval also depends on WAF/CDN policy, robots status and crawl caches.

---

Analysis Procedure

Step 1: Fetch and Parse robots.txt

1. Validate the authorized HTTPS origin, redirects and public destination; bound requests/time/bytes and fetch [domain]/robots.txt without credentials. Record errors/status distinctly from missing rules.

2. Parse all User-agent directives and their associated Allow/Disallow rules.

3. For each verified crawler and representative URL, apply RFC 9309 group merging and longest-path match (Allow wins equal specificity), not a whole-site binary:

• Check if there is a specific User-agent block for that crawler
• Check if there is a wildcard (User-agent: *) block that would apply
• Determine effective access: Allowed, Blocked, or Not Mentioned (inherits wildcard rules)

4. Note any Crawl-delay directives that may slow AI crawler access.

5. Check for Sitemap directives (AI crawlers use these for discovery).

Step 2: Check Meta Robots Tags

1. For a sample of 5-10 key pages, fetch the HTML and check for:

• <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> -- indexing directive for supporting agents, not access control
• <meta name="robots" content="nofollow"> -- supported link-handling hint, not a universal fetch ban
• <meta name="robots" content="noai"> -- nonstandard proposal; verify operator support before assigning effect
• <meta name="robots" content="noimageai"> -- nonstandard; do not assume operator enforcement
• Bot-specific meta tags: <meta name="GPTBot" content="noindex">

2. Record any page-level overrides of the robots.txt directives.

Step 3: Check HTTP Headers

1. For the same sample pages, check response headers for:

• X-Robots-Tag: noindex -- HTTP header equivalent of meta noindex
• X-Robots-Tag: noai -- HTTP header to block AI use
• X-Robots-Tag: noimageai -- nonstandard; do not assume operator enforcement
• Bot-specific headers: X-Robots-Tag: GPTBot: noindex

2. Evaluate supported meta/header directives together under each operator's documented rules; there is no universal header-overrides-meta rule. Headers can cover non-HTML resources.

Step 4: Check for AI-Specific Files

1. Check for /llms.txt as an optional proposal; presence is not a platform indexing requirement.

2. Record a legacy /.well-known/ai-plugin.json only as historical integration metadata, not a current crawler prerequisite.

3. Check for /ai.txt (proposed standard, similar to ads.txt for AI).

4. Record presence/absence and quality of each file.

Step 5: Assess JavaScript Rendering Requirements

1. Check if the site is a Single Page Application (SPA) or heavily JavaScript-rendered.

2. Compare raw response with an authorized rendered page and record which content

requires JavaScript. Do not invent each crawler's rendering capabilities from

product names; Google-Extended is a control token, not a rendering engine.

3. If critical content requires JS rendering, flag this as a potential issue.

4. Check for Server-Side Rendering (SSR) or Static Site Generation (SSG) as mitigations.

Step 6: Parse Content Signals

Using the already-fetched robots.txt from Step 1, scan for Content-Signal: directives (optional provider-defined extension; not RFC 9309 enforcement).

1. Scan every line for a line starting with Content-Signal: (case-insensitive).

2. If found:

• Parse all key=value pairs (split on , then on =).
• Validate keys against the known set: ai-train, search, ai-input in the Cloudflare Content Signals implementation.
• Validate values: only yes and no are valid.
• Flag any unknown keys or invalid values as a warning — record the exact implementation/version; do not conflate it with a final IETF standard.
• Record syntax as Parsed, not proof of compliance or crawler behavior and surface parsed values with plain-English meaning.

3. If absent: record as Absent — ask whether the publisher wants an optional declaration.

No additional HTTP request is needed. robots.txt is already fetched in Step 1.

---

Output Format

Generate a file called GEO-CRAWLER-ACCESS.md:

# AI Crawler Access Report: [Domain]

**Analysis Date:** [Date]
**Domain:** [Domain]
**robots.txt Status:** [Found/Not Found/Error]

---

## Crawler Access Summary

| Crawler | Operator | Tier | Status | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | OpenAI | 1 | [Allowed/Blocked/Not Mentioned] | [Impact description] |
| OAI-SearchBot | OpenAI | 1 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | 1 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| ClaudeBot | Anthropic | 1 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | 1 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| Google-Extended | Google | 2 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| GoogleOther | Google | 2 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| Applebot-Extended | Apple | 2 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| Amazonbot | Amazon | 2 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| FacebookBot | Meta | 2 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| CCBot | Common Crawl | 3 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| anthropic-ai | Anthropic | 3 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| Bytespider | ByteDance | 3 | [Status] | [Impact] |
| cohere-ai | Cohere | 3 | [Status] | [Impact] |

## AI Visibility Score: [X]/100

**Tier 1 Access:** [X/5 crawlers allowed]
**Tier 2 Access:** [X/5 crawlers allowed]
**Tier 3 Access:** [X/4 crawlers allowed]

---

## Critical Issues

[List any Tier 1 crawlers that are blocked]

## Recommendations

### Immediate Actions
[Specific robots.txt changes needed]

### robots.txt Recommendation

[Complete recommended robots.txt content for AI crawlers]

### Additional Technical Findings
- **Meta Robots Tags:** [Findings]
- **X-Robots-Tag Headers:** [Findings]
- **JavaScript Rendering:** [Assessment]
- **llms.txt:** [Present/Absent]
- **Sitemap Accessibility:** [Assessment]

### Content Signals (IETF Draft)

**Status:** Present / Absent

<!-- If present: -->
| Signal Key | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| ai-train | no | Opted out of AI model training |
| search | yes | Prefers indexing and links/excerpts; this implementation separates generative input |
| ai-input | yes | Prefers use as generative model input |

<!-- If absent: -->
**Recommendation:** Add a `Content-Signal:` directive to robots.txt to declare AI usage preferences explicitly. Example:

`Content-Signal: ai-train=no, search=yes, ai-input=yes`

See https://contentsignals.org/ for the full specification.

---

Scoring for Crawler Access

The imported tier/point rubric below is an op

… (nội dung đầy đủ có trong gói tải về)