bug-bounty – skill Bảo mật cho agent AI

Bug Bounty Master Workflow

Full pipeline: Recon -> Learn -> Hunt -> Validate -> Report. One skill for everything.

THE ONLY QUESTION THAT MATTERS

> "Can an attacker do this RIGHT NOW against a real user who has taken NO unusual actions -- and does it cause real harm (stolen money, leaked PII, account takeover, code execution)?"

>

> If the answer is NO -- STOP. Do not write. Do not explore further. Move on.

Theoretical Bug = Wasted Time. Kill These Immediately:

| Pattern | Kill Reason |

|---|---|

| "Could theoretically allow..." | Not exploitable = not a bug |

| "An attacker with X, Y, Z conditions could..." | Too many preconditions |

| "Wrong implementation but no practical impact" | Wrong but harmless = not a bug |

| Dead code with a bug in it | Not reachable = not a bug |

| Source maps without secrets | No impact |

| SSRF with DNS-only callback | Need data exfil or internal access |

| Open redirect alone | Need ATO or OAuth chain |

| "Could be used in a chain if..." | Build the chain first, THEN report |

You must demonstrate actual harm. "Could" is not a bug. Prove it works or drop it.

---

CRITICAL RULES

1. READ FULL SCOPE FIRST -- verify every asset/domain is owned by the target org

2. NO THEORETICAL BUGS -- "Can an attacker steal funds, leak PII, takeover account, or execute code RIGHT NOW?" If no, STOP.

3. KILL WEAK FINDINGS FAST -- run the 7-Question Gate BEFORE writing any report

4. Validate before writing -- check CHANGELOG, design docs, deployment scripts FIRST

5. One bug class at a time -- go deep, don't spray

6. Verify data isn't already public -- check web UI in incognito before reporting API "leaks"

7. 5-MINUTE RULE -- if a target shows nothing after 5 min probing (all 401/403/404), MOVE ON

8. IMPACT-FIRST HUNTING -- ask "what's the worst thing if auth was broken?" If nothing valuable, skip target

9. CREDENTIAL LEAKS need exploitation proof -- finding keys isn't enough, must PROVE what they access

10. STOP SHALLOW RECON SPIRALS -- don't probe 403s, don't grep for analytics keys, don't check staging domains that lead nowhere

11. BUSINESS IMPACT over vuln class -- severity depends on CONTEXT, not just vuln type

12. UNDERSTAND THE TARGET DEEPLY -- before hunting, learn the app like a real user

13. DON'T OVER-RELY ON AUTOMATION -- automated scans hit WAFs, trigger rate limits, find the same bugs everyone else finds

14. HUNT LESS-SATURATED VULN CLASSES -- XSS/SSRF/XXE have the most competition. Expand into: cache poisoning, Android/mobile vulns, business logic, race conditions, OAuth/OIDC chains, CI/CD pipeline attacks

15. ONE-HOUR RULE -- stuck on one target for an hour with no progress? SWITCH CONTEXT

16. TWO-EYE APPROACH -- combine systematic testing (checklist) with anomaly detection (watch for unexpected behavior)

17. T-SHAPED KNOWLEDGE -- go DEEP in one area and BROAD across everything else

> For the full hunting methodology — 5-phase non-linear workflow, developer psychology framework, session discipline, command-line routing by phase, and Wide/Deep route selection — see skills/bb-methodology/SKILL.md.

---

A->B BUG SIGNAL METHOD (Cluster Hunting)

When you find bug A, systematically hunt for B and C nearby. This is one of the most powerful methodologies in bug bounty. Single bugs pay. Chains pay 3-10x more.

Known A->B->C Chains

| Bug A (Signal) | Hunt for Bug B | Escalate to C |

|----------------|---------------|---------------|

| IDOR (read) | PUT/DELETE on same endpoint | Full account data manipulation |

| SSRF (any) | Cloud metadata [REDACTED_IP] | IAM credential exfil -> RCE |

| XSS (stored) | Check if HttpOnly is set on session cookie | Session hijack -> ATO |

| Open redirect | OAuth redirect_uri accepts your domain | Auth code theft -> ATO |

| S3 bucket listing | Enumerate JS bundles | Grep for OAuth client_secret -> OAuth chain |

| Rate limit bypass | OTP brute force | Account takeover |

| GraphQL introspection | Missing field-level auth | Mass PII exfil |

| Debug endpoint | Leaked environment variables | Cloud credential -> infrastructure access |

| CORS reflects origin | Test with credentials: include | Credentialed data theft |

| Host header injection | Password reset poisoning | ATO via reset link |

Cluster Hunt Protocol (6 Steps)

1. CONFIRM A     Verify bug A is real with an HTTP request
2. MAP SIBLINGS  Find all endpoints in the same controller/module/API group
3. TEST SIBLINGS Apply the same bug pattern to every sibling
4. CHAIN         If sibling has different bug class, try combining A + B
5. QUANTIFY      "Affects N users" / "exposes $X value" / "N records"
6. REPORT        One report per chain (not per bug). Chains pay more.

Real Examples

Coinbase S3->Bundle->Secret->OAuth chain:

A: S3 bucket publicly listable (Low alone)
B: JS bundles contain OAuth client credentials
C: OAuth flow missing PKCE enforcement
Result: Full auth code interception chain

Vienna Chatbot chain:

A: Debug parameter active in production (Info alone)
B: Chatbot renders HTML in response (dangerouslySetInnerHTML)
C: Stored XSS via bot response visible to other users
Result: P2 finding with real impact

---

TOP 1% HACKER MINDSET

How Elite Hackers Think Differently

Average hunter: Runstools, checks checklist, gives up after 30 min.

Top 1%: Builds a mental model of the app's internals. Asks "why does this work the way it does?" Not "what does this endpoint do?" but "what business decision led a developer to build it this way, and what shortcut might they have taken?"

Pre-Hunt Mental Framework

Step 1: Crown Jewel Thinking

Before touching anything, ask: "If I were the attacker and I could do ONE thing to this app, what causes the most damage?"

• Financial app -> drain funds, transfer to attacker account
• Healthcare -> PII leak, HIPAA violation
• SaaS -> tenant data crossing, admin takeover
• Auth provider -> full SSO chain compromise

Step 2: Developer Empathy

Think like the developer who built the feature:

• What was the simplest implementation?
• What shortcut would a tired dev take at 2am?
• Where is auth checked -- controller? middleware? DB layer?
• What happens when you call endpoint B without going through endpoint A first?

Step 3: Trust Boundary Mapping

Client -> CDN -> Load Balancer -> App Server -> Database
         ^               ^              ^
    Where does app STOP trusting input?
    Where does it ASSUME input is already validated?

Step 4: Feature Interaction Thinking

• Does this new feature reuse old auth, or does it have its own?
• Does the mobile API share auth logic with the web app?
• Was this feature built by the same team or a third-party?

The Top 1% Mental Checklist

• [ ] I know the app's core business model
• [ ] I've used the app as a real user for 15+ minutes
• [ ] I know the tech stack (language, framework, auth system, caching)
• [ ] I've read at least 3 disclosed reports for this program
• [ ] I have 2 test accounts ready (attacker + victim)
• [ ] I've defined my primary target: ONE crown jewel I'm hunting for today

Mindset Rules from Top Hunters

"Hunt the feature, not the endpoint" -- Find all endpoints that serve a feature, then test the INTERACTION between them.

"Authorization inconsistency is your friend" -- If the app checks auth in 9 places but not the 10th, that's your bug.

"New == unreviewed" -- Features launched in the last 30 days have lowest security maturity.

"Think second-order" -- Second-order SSRF: URL saved in DB, fetched by cron job. Second-order XSS: stored clean, rendered unsafely in admin panel.

"Follow the money" -- Any feature touching payments, billing, credits, refunds is where developers make the most security shortcuts.

"The API the mobile app uses" -- Mobile apps often call older/different API versions. Same company, different attack surface, lower maturity.

"Diffs find bugs" -- Compare old API docs vs new. Compare mobile API vs web API. Compare what a free user can request vs what a paid user gets in response.

---

TOOLS

Go Binaries

| Tool | Use |

|------|-----|

| subfinder | Passive subdomain enum |

| httpx | Probe live hosts |

| dnsx | DNS resolution |

| nuclei | Template scanner |

| katana | Crawl |

| waybackurls | Archive URLs |

| gau | Known URLs |

| dalfox | XSS scanner |

| ffuf | Fuzzer |

| anew | Dedup append |

| qsreplace | Replace param values |

| assetfinder | Subdomain enum |

| gf | Grep patterns (xss, sqli, ssrf, redirect) |

| interactsh-client | OOB callbacks |

Tools to Install When Needed

| Tool | Use | Install |

|------|-----|---------|

| arjun | Hidden parameter discovery | pip3 install arjun |

| paramspider | URL parameter mining | pip3 install paramspider |

| kiterunner | API endpoint brute | go install github.com/assetnote/kiterunner/cmd/kr@latest |

| cloudenum | Cloud asset enume

… (nội dung đầy đủ có trong gói tải về)