board-meeting – skill Agent & Tự động hóa cho agent AI
Quy trình họp hội đồng nhiều agent cho các quyết định chiến lược. Chạy thảo luận có cấu trúc 6 giai đoạn: nạp ngữ cảnh, đóng góp độc lập của C-suite (cách ly, không trao đổi chéo), phân tích phản biện, tổng hợp, founder xem xét và rút ra quyết định. Dùng khi người dùng gọi /c-level-agents:boardroom, gọi board
Cài skill board-meeting bằng một lệnh
Chọn công cụ bạn đang dùng, copy lệnh và dán vào terminal. Skill sẽ nằm trong thư mục skills của công cụ đó và sẵn sàng dùng ở phiên làm việc tiếp theo.
Claude Code
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/board-meeting-8717b.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.claude/skills
Gọi trong Claude Code: /board-meeting – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Codex
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/board-meeting-8717b.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.codex/skills
Gọi trong Codex: $board-meeting – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Hermes Agent
mkdir -p ~/.hermes/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/board-meeting-8717b.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.hermes/skills
Gọi trong Hermes Agent: /board-meeting – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
DeepSeek
mkdir -p ~/.deepcode/skills && curl -fsSL https://skill.dn1nguoi.com/z/board-meeting-8717b.tgz | tar xz -C ~/.deepcode/skills
Gọi trong DeepSeek: /board-meeting – rồi mô tả công việc bạn muốn làm.
Nội dung SKILL.md
Nội dung SKILL.md gốc bằng tiếng Anh.
Board Meeting Protocol
Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.
Keywords
board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, /c-level-agents:boardroom, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives
Invoke
/c-level-agents:boardroom [topic] — e.g. /c-level-agents:boardroom Should we expand to Spain in Q3?
---
The 6-Phase Protocol
PHASE 1: Context Gathering
1. Load ~/.claude/company-context.md
2. Load Layer 2 approved decisions from ~/.claude/decisions/approved/ (Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)
3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations
4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation
Chief of Staff selects relevant roles based on topic (not all 14 every time):
| Topic | Activate |
|-------|----------|
| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |
| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |
| Hiring/org | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO (+ VPE for eng hiring) |
| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |
| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |
| Contracts / term sheets / legal exposure | GC, CEO, CFO |
| Data strategy / training-data rights | CDO, CAIO, GC, CISO |
| AI strategy / model selection / AI risk | CAIO, CTO, CDO, CFO |
| Retention / churn / customer success | CCO, CRO, CPO |
| Eng delivery / DORA / team structure | VPE, CTO, CHRO, CFO |
---
PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)
No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.
Order: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO → GC → CDO → CAIO → CCO → VPE (activated roles only)
Reasoning techniques: CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data | GC: Risk-Based (clause exposure) | CDO: Decision-Driven (what decision does this data drive) | CAIO: Eval-Demanding (no eval, no ship) | CCO: Retention-Obsessed (GRR over NRR) | VPE: Throughput-First (cycle-time math)
Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):
## [ROLE] — [DATE]
Key points (max 5):
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴
Recommendation: [clear position]
Confidence: High / Medium / Low
Source: [where the data came from]
What would change my mind: [specific condition]Each agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.
---
PHASE 3: Critic Analysis
Executive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.
Checklist:
- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)
- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?
- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)
- What risk has nobody mentioned?
- Which agent operated outside their domain?
---
PHASE 4: Synthesis
Chief of Staff delivers using the Board Meeting Output format (defined in ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md):
- Decision Required (one sentence)
- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)
- Where They Agree / Where They Disagree
- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)
- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)
- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)
---
PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️
Full stop. Wait for the founder.
⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]
Options: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-upRules:
- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No "but the CFO said..."
- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as "pending review"
- Reopen any time with
/c-level-agents:boardroom resume
---
PHASE 6: Decision Extraction
After founder approval:
- Layer 1: Write full transcript →
~/.claude/decisions/raw/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md - Layer 2: Write approved decision record →
~/.claude/decisions/approved/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.mdand append to the index~/.claude/decisions/approved/decisions.md - Mark rejected proposals
[DO_NOT_RESURFACE] - Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added
---
Memory Structure
Uses the canonical two-layer decision memory (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md → "Decision Memory (Canonical Layout)"):
~/.claude/decisions/
├── raw/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)
├── raw/archive/YYYY/ # Raw transcripts after 90 days
├── approved/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md # Layer 2 — founder-approved records (Phase 1 loads these)
└── approved/decisions.md # Layer 2 index — append-onlyFuture meetings load Layer 2 only. Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.
Migration: a legacy memory/board-meetings/ folder may exist from earlier versions; read it for history but write new transcripts and decisions to ~/.claude/decisions/.
---
Failure Mode Quick Reference
| Failure | Fix |
|---------|-----|
| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force "strongest argument against" |
| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |
| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |
| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |
| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads ~/.claude/decisions/approved/ only — hard rule |
---
References
templates/meeting-agenda.md— agenda formattemplates/meeting-minutes.md— final output formatreferences/meeting-facilitation.md— conflict handling, timing, failure modes
Skill liên quan
- airtable-automation – Tự động hóa tác vụ Airtable qua Rube MCP (Composio): records, bases, tables, fields…
- alex – Biến yêu cầu thành kế hoạch triển khai chính xác, có xét đến các phụ thuộc.
- boardroom – /c-level-agents:boardroom [brief]: thảo luận nhiều vai trò qua 6 giai đoạn trong ban…
- amplitude-automation – Tự động hóa tác vụ Amplitude qua Rube MCP (Composio): sự kiện, hoạt động người dùng…
- analyze-project – Trình phân tích nguyên nhân gốc (forensic) cho các phiên Antigravity. Phân loại thay đổi…
- brief – /c-level-agents:brief [topic] — Tạo bản tóm tắt chiến lược một trang từ biểu mẫu…
- humanize-automation – Hành vi chuột, bàn phím và cuộn giống người để vượt qua kiểm tra bot dựa trên hành vi.
- browser-automation – Dùng khi người dùng yêu cầu tự động hóa tác vụ trên trình duyệt, scrape website, điền…